W. Steve Wilson

It’s A Long Way to Mars – Don’t Forget Scrabble

When I first planned this installment of the Mars Beckons blog, I thought I’d be discussing what the astronauts/settlers would do on the way to Mars. Once it’s time to go, about every two years, we’ll see anywhere from four astronauts (the crew size of NASA’s Orion spacecraft) to one-hundred settlers (Elon Musk’s reported passenger compliment on Starship) heading out on a six-month journey to The Red Planet. That’s a long trip and a long time to be in transit.

So—what will they do?

There’s not much information out there. Science and Research. Health and Fitness. Leisure and Relaxation. That’s it. Those are all the details I can find.

To be sure, we’ve learned from the almost twenty-five years (twenty-five years on 11/02/2025) of occupying the International Space Station (ISS) that health and fitness are a must. Six-months of living on the ISS can cause muscle weakness, bone loss, immune deficiencies, etc. Exercise and constant health monitoring are essential. Consider the challenges of six to nine months of transit time to Mars, a year or more in partial gravity (Mars’s gravity is about 38% of Earth’s) and then a six to nine months return trip. The Health and Fitness requirements are compounded.

And of course, we all need time off to recharge, enjoy our personal interests, connect with friends and family, and so on. The first travelers to Mars will need the same. But how will that work with twenty-minute delays in communication, limited space (and mass) for non- critical materials and supplies? And you better enjoy the conversation of your fellow travelers.

These are all topics that could deserve their own blog post series. If you’re interested in a more detailed discussion of these topics, I’d suggest checking out the NASA site for the ISS at International Space Station – NASA.

But I can imagine, as any science fiction fan can, how they might feel in the confines of a steel box, traveling twenty-five thousand miles an hour, tens of millions of miles from Earth. My research led me to consider the “steel box” aspect of the trip.

For NASA’s Orion spaceship, the confines are just that—confining. The craft is approximately sixteen feet in diameter, ten feet tall, and tapered. That’s smaller than my living room, and I don’t live in a large house. Imagine spending six months in that space—with three other people. [Image Credit: Orion Interior – NASA] I would find that claustrophobic and anxiety-laden. At the very least, I’d need to get away from my fellow travelers and have some “alone time.” I’m pretty sure I would not be a suitable candidate for the trip. Would you?

Now that space won’t carry all their supplies, plus the room and equipment for the essential activities “detailed” previously. The information I can find is that Orion will dock with a larger habitat module, still under design. We’ll see what that module looks like when details become available. [Note: if anybody has found an early rendering, let me know in the comments.]

Then there’s Starship. A larger spacecraft, maybe accommodating maybe 20. One schematic shows areas for sleeping quarters, equipment storage, etc.

[Note: this is not a SpaceX rendering. Image Credit: All+Decks+of+SpaceX+100-passenger+Starship+design+by+Ace+%26+Michel+Lamontagne.jpg (1371×1673)]

Starship is still in development, and the component planned to travel to Mars is not finalized; that’s years away. But that’s not to say we can’t consider what might be on the ship. Unlike Orion, docked to a larger habitat module, which will not land on Mars, Starship is expected to do just that. We can expect then that Starship will have space and equipment for the journey to Mars, plus what the astronauts will need to land and operate on Mars.

One futurist has prepared a short (~13 minutes) video about what Starship might look like. [Video URL: https://youtu.be/XC3dwEVxYEM]. Although Elon Musk has mentioned one-hundred people per trip, the video suggests it will probably be closer to twenty. But the ship in the video looks spacious and accommodating.

Of course, movies have contemplated the interiors of Mars-bound spaceships for years. Their design aesthetic

is interesting to ponder. I’ve always loved the aesthetics of the 50s. Plenty of room to conduct experiments. Like today, 1959’s The Angry Red Planet contemplated doing scientific experiments.

Plus plenty of room and time to have interesting discussions, when you’re not pressing all the buttons, turning all the knobs, and pulling all the levers.

[Image Credits: https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=Angry+Red+Planet+Faint+Nora+Hayden&FORM=IRIBEP https://tse4.mm.bing.net/th/id/OIP.iK3ov0FKwI9kTGjCyjnZlgHaEL?r=0&rs=1&pid=ImgDetMain&o=7&rm=3]

As we move forward in time, the sets become more “futuristic” but are of a type that the Dragon craft sports.

Sleek. Clean. No knobs and buttons. This aesthetic actually isn’t that new. Just nine years after The Angry Red Planet, we got 2001: A Space Odyssey.

[Image Credit: 2001-A-Space-Odyssey-57.00-Jupiter-Mission-Exercise-1340×602.jpg (1340×602)]

Which is of a type reflected in the movie The Martian, from the novel by Andy Weir of the same name. If anything, the latter interior is busier. [Image Credit: OIP.QiuX7Nv8LKWrsbuDrfBNGgHaD1 (474×245)]

In all these instances, there’s plenty of room to move around, exercise, spend leisure time, conduct work, and engage in other useful activities. It seems the filmmakers, as far back as at least the 50s, knew what NASA and SpaceX are addressing. On long missions, people need to pursue: Science and Research. Health and Fitness. Leisure and Relaxation.

Are you ready to sign up? Let me know what you think about spending six months in a steel box, traveling twenty-five thousand miles an hour, tens of millions of miles from Earth, with your soon-to-be closest friends.

Don’t forget the Scabble game.

Thanks for stopping by.

It’s 2025 and Mars Beckons—Go for Launch 10,000 times

A few years ago, I attended a science fiction convention where one presentation discussed the number of launches it would take to achieve Elon Musk’s goal of moving one-million people to Mars over an assumed 10-year period. At 100 passengers per launch, that would be 100 launches per year (10,000 people)—two a week. SpaceX Mars colonization program – Wikipedia.

I’d travel to Starbase in Texas to watch that.

I should note here, the presenter estimated about 10 times that number of launches to send materials, components for the habitat, fuel for getting the Starship upper stage to and from Mars, landing on Mars, and so on. That required 1,000 launches per year or 20 per week. Putting is gently—he was a skeptic.

But I would look at this from a different perspective and consider how much weight Starship can launch into orbit. To keep it simple, I’ll use the information from Wikipedia and use the figure of 150 metric tons per launch. SpaceX Starship – Wikipedia (Note: the space shuttle could deliver 25 metric tons to orbit. Space Shuttle – Wikipedia)

Let’s suppose we want to send one-hundred people, including their “luggage” allotment, at 500 pounds per person. That’s about 226 kilograms per person, or 22.6 metric tons of people and their stuff, per launch. So what do you fill Starship with? What makes up the other 125 metric tons for that launch?

Good question. You’ll need supplies, of course, for the three-month trip. But you could throw in, say, 100 metric tons of supplies.

Why is that important? Well, one estimate we can use is they’ll need 1 million tons of supplies and materials to build a city for the 1 million people. That would be about 6,700 launches. But maybe some of that could go with the passenger launches, perhaps as much as 100,000 tons. Consider that a contingency perhaps.

Regardless, 10,000 launches might not be a bad estimate of what it would take.

Which brings me to the other two drivers of how we can get the materials needed to build a city on Mars and move 1 million people: how many ships are available and how much time does it take. Let’s start with estimating 40 years to complete the project. If we do indeed need 10,000 launches, that’s 250 launches a year, 5 per week. That still seems like a lot, but there’s been talk about a sub-orbital, rocket system for passenger service around the world. (see my blog Breakfast in New York – Lunch in Singapore – Dinner in London); 5 launches a week might just be doable.

Finally, how many ships would we need? If the refurbishment/turnaround time is one month, for example, some number of ships are in transit, and maybe some stay in orbit or on Mars, would 100 be unreasonable? Numbers are feeling more manageable.

To put it in human-size terms, we’d need 100 ships, launching 5 times per week for 40 years. That’s manageable in less than a single lifetime. If I had a trillion dollars, I might do that; perhaps somebody will.

Or we could do one and done. (Of course, I have to bring sci-fi into this.) In the classic 1951 film, When Worlds Collide, humanity is saved in a single ship, with a single launch, with everything they need for the new world, including livestock.

Doable? Likely not, but a fun movie.

Check it out: https://youtu.be/avtQ8elxL-o?t=96

(My apologies for any YouTube ads).

 Buckle up, we are go for launch.

Thanks for stopping by.

Mars Beckons – 9 Big Things to Get Right

Mars—that reddish sparkle in the night sky. Mars—a planet empty (we think), cold, dry, and dusty. Mars—it beckons.

I’ve been reading about Mars for probably as long as I’ve been able to read. I’ve read Edgar Rice Burroughs’s John Carter Mars series more times than I care to admit. In fact, a paper I wrote on the series was one of the few A’s I received on an English paper in high school.

Expeditions to our neighbor and the amazing things we’ve learned have kept me just waiting for more: more missions, more progress, and more movies and more books. I even ventured to Southern Utah last year to immerse myself in all things Mars. (You can read about that adventure at Mars Analog 2: An Expedition to the “Martian” Desert.)

And here we are. Robot landers and rovers are hard at work. Orbiting observatories are mapping and analyzing. And maybe, just maybe, we’ll see a human landing in the near future. (I keep my fingers crossed for every Starship launch and can’t wait for the next Artemis missions to the Moon as stepping stones to an expedition to Mars.)

At the risk of sounding obvious, the challenges are legion.

As I discussed in my opening page for the year CE 2025, I’ll turn my comments and posts to the idea of establishing a human foothold on The Red Planet. As we proceed through the year, I hope you’ll follow along and that my posts spark some thought on what it would take to get there and what we’ll do when we arrive.

Here are nine top level topics to get us started, in no particular order:

  • Rocketry. Getting us off the planet Earth and on our way.
  • Transit. Surviving and thriving during the extended trip to Mars.
  • Settlement. Living and working in a hostile environment.
  • Resources. Supplying the settlement from Earth or locally.
  • Agriculture. Feeding the settlers.
  • Economics. Making the society self-sufficient.
  • Population. Growing the human presence.
  • Cultural. Developing a Martian identity.
  • Politics. Governing the settlement.

So, over the next several months, I’ll share my thoughts on these topics, provide some sources that reveal what’s being done or discussed in these areas, and, of course, make the occasional reference to science fiction movies and books.

Going to Mars is not a new thing. Humans have been studying Mars for almost four-thousand years, and the earliest fictional accounts of Mars, or traveling there appeared in the late 1800s, including H. G. Wells’s War of the Worlds. (Image: UK First Edition, File:The War of the Worlds first edition.jpg – Wikipedia)

There’s lots to cover and no shortage of fascinating stories.

I’ll do my best to be informative and entertaining. If you have a topic, you’d like to cover or have questions as we go, leave a comment, or send me a note using the Contact form.

Buckle up, we are go for launch.

Thanks for stopping by.

In the Year 2025

Welcome to my blog for the year 2025. The first half of the year has been busy, so we’ll need to cram a lot into six months.

In past years, I’ve roamed across topics and shared my thoughts and excitement about recent developments and interesting topics in Science and Technology. And those are broad topics and could cover just about anything.

This year I’d like to take a focused approach and talk about topics related to putting humans on Mars and developing a permanent presence on The Red Planet. In the first blog post I’ll layout the topics that we’ll cover for the year. Then each month, I’ll post a more detailed recap of the topic. Along the way, I’ll bring in other sources you can check for more detail, and I’m sure I’ll refer to where and when Science Fiction tackled the topic. Stay tuned.

This should be fun. I love research, and building a possible future world on Mars means I get to cover a wide swath of our modern society. You never know when you’ll come across an idea or a surprise solution. So, I’ll share what I discover and hope you find it interesting.

I hope you will enjoy my posts, and if you’d like to discuss a particular topic or stay connected, please slide over to my Contact page. Please join my email list as well to receive advance notice of upcoming stories of aliens, strange worlds, and mysteries on the short fiction tab.

Thank you again for visiting my blog.

Mars Analog 2: An Expedition to the “Martian” Desert

Trans Earth Injection was successful!

I have returned from my trip to The Mars Desert Research Station (MDRS) as part of the Refit Crew. A team of Mars enthusiasts spent 9+ days upgrading, refurbishing, and renovating The Mars Society’s Mars analog in Southeast Utah.

The place felt like Mars; a quick look out the window would make that real. The colors were ruddy; there was no vegetation but plenty of empty space. The only clues you were on Earth (as a view) were the larger sun and the beautiful blue sky. One wonders how visitors to Mars will adapt. Will they miss a bright yellow Sol? Will they miss clear blue skies or clouds? All questions that I’ll bet are under study. Just Google researching the psychology of living on Mars, and you’ll find any number of articles on the topic. [Note: the link is that search prompt entered into Google.]

Simulations, including the recently completed CHAPEA Mission 1, are attempting to address these issues. One question that may have to wait is how the dynamics of a small team in an isolated habitat play out when the team knows they aren’t just an airlock door away from Earth when they are actually on Mars. That’s a topic for another post.

But, back to the Refit Expedition. The Refit Crew was tasked with upgrades, refurbishment, and getting the MDRS ready for the first crew of the following research season. Here’s a short list and some pictures:

Rebuild the shower

Install padding on the ladder steps (so you don’t need boots to climb the stairs)

Re-model two crew staterooms

Dig trenches and lay stone walk areas (it might not rain on Mars—yet—but it does rain in Southeastern Utah, and flooding can be a problem)

Get the rovers out of storage and charged up

Upgrade the wall/floor interface (looks finished and keeps out the little, furry “locals”—again, a Utah issue, but not yet a Mars issue)

Patch and paint walls, handrails, airlock doors, and airlock openings

We were awed by the view of our home galaxy (at least this “city boy” was), caught a glimpse of the aurora borealis (through our iPhones), and even met one of the locals.

Last, we had a great team: an astronomer, a planetary scientist, a book editor/coach, a game developer, a couple of retired IT guys, a wetlands/reclamation specialist, a bio-medical student, an architect, a software engineer, etc. plus the site director. We were a mixed bunch but with mad skills and a shared interest in Mars and all things interplanetary. We shared one thing, though—we’ve all seen (and mostly liked) every science fiction movie from the Seventies. One of the crew members mentioned it might be because there are so few of them compared to later decades. Needless to say, our dinner discussions were heaven for a sci-fi geek like me.

We had a fabulous time. We worked hard, had fun, “worked” the daily checklist, and enjoyed the area’s natural wonders and good food and conversation when we trekked into town.

I can’t wait ’till next year.

In the meantime, check out The Mars Society (The Mars Society) and the MDRS (Mars Desert Research Station (marssociety.org)), and support them if you’re so inclined.

Thanks for stopping by.

Mars Analogs: Live a Martian Lifestyle Right Here on Earth

Mars Analogs. Not a term I’d heard until a few months ago when The Mars Society put out an appeal for volunteers to join a re-hab crew at the Mars Desert Research Station in southeastern Utah. I’d heard of specific facilities and experiments run by NASA, but not the MDRS nor the term Mars Analog. (MDRS: Mars Desert Research Station (marssociety.org))

As I prepared to head to Utah to join the re-hab crew, I thought I’d check in on what’s going on at other analogs. There are more than you might think, and certainly the ubiquitous Wikipedia page lists several, with links to their details (List of Mars analogs – Wikipedia).

Several analog cycles have concluded in the last couple of months. Most notably, CHAPEA Mission 1 (CHAPEA Mission 1 – NASA) wrapped up in July with the crew exiting the habitat after 378 days in isolation.

NASA’s Antarctic facility (referred to as “white Mars”) is part of the Human Research Program (Antarctic Stations – NASA) NASA states:

“Antarctica’s climate, terrain, temperature, and isolation provide an environment on Earth that closely parallels the conditions of isolation and stress that astronauts will face on long-duration missions in space. This analog provides a unique and accessible test bed to develop prototype systems and technologies for use on the Moon and Mars.”

And yes, you read that right, I’m heading to the MDRS in the near future. But no, I’m not joining a Mars simulation mission, but rather joining the team that is prepping the facility for the next research season that starts in mid-October. I’d love to be part of a real research cycle, maybe play the role of the useless stowaway that rises to the occasion to save the day. But my guess is, that’s not a role they typically fill.

So I’m excited to go and spend a couple of weeks working on the habitat and, as my wife puts it, “geeking out” with my fellow Mars enthusiasts.

But as you know from past issues, I can let a post go by without a movie reference.

I will try to avoid embarrassing myself and thus include only this passing reference to the absurd Bio-Dome (included here only in reference to my remark above about the useless stowaway) and move on to darker reference to a Mars-like habitat in the 1977 science fiction thriller, Capricorn One (2-minute video).

[Image Credit: v67566dd67m.jpg (442×800) (rovicorp.com)]

The movie centers on a Mars mission, doomed to failure. The “government” decides to have the crew live in a simulated Mars environment, send back updates, and ultimately return to Earth—sure, what could go wrong. No spoilers here though.

So, I guess when the first mission to Mars is launched, the conspiracy theorists will be staking out all the Mars analogs that are around the world.

I just hope they don’t show up when we’re re-habing the MDRS.

I’ll provide a mission de-brief when I return from Utah and let you all know how it went. In the meantime, check out The Mars Society (The Mars Society) and the MDRS (Mars Desert Research Station (marssociety.org)), and support them if you’re so inclined.

Thanks for stopping by.

CE 2024: Another Year of Hot Topics and the Odd Weird Tale

Welcome to my author website, and thank you for reading my blog for the new year 2024.

As in prior years, I thought I’d let you know what to expect—my thoughts and excitement about recent developments and interesting topics in Science and Technology.

Again, those are broad topics and could cover just about anything.

Last year, we covered Atomic Rockets, travel to Mars, AI Writers, Lab Grown Food, and the first in my robot series: Robot Likability. Mostly, you’ll see posts on rocketry, lunar and planetary exploration, deep space discoveries, genetics, medicine, technology, and renewable energy.

Truthfully—I love research, and building a fictional future world means I get to cover a wide swath of our modern society. You never know when you’ll come across an idea for a new mystery, a plot twist, a hidden clue, or a surprise solution. So, I’ll share what I discover and hope you find it interesting.

But I don’t spend my whole life in the real world. I’m an avid Science Fiction and Mystery reader and movie watcher. Occasionally, I’ll veer off and post a book, series, or movie review. I’ll post about old and new entries and touch on a classic now and then. B-movies will, I’m sure, make an appearance.

I hope you will enjoy my posts, and if you’d like to discuss a particular topic or stay connected, please slide over to my Contact page. Please join my email list as well to receive advance notice of upcoming short fiction.

Thank you again for visiting my blog.

AIs: Just What in the Heck are They Learning?

In the hilarious Bill Murray* comedy Stripes, the misfit platoon is late for basic training graduation, and the general asks them where they’ve been. Murray’s response is, “Training, sir.” To which the general asks, “What kind of training?” And in classic Murray fashion, the answer is, “Arrrmy training, sir.”

(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHcMxOJ5BN4, 2:15 minutes)

[Image Credit: https://www.deviantart.com/topher147/art/Bill-Murray-Army-Training-591625354]

One might ask this same question, “What kind of training?”, about ChatGPT and other AI based tools we may access regularly to have fun, do work, explore, create, etc. When we engage with these “entities” (as they often seem to interact with us in almost conversational ways), how much do we know regarding the data used to train AIs or GPT models?

How does the data used to pre-train the GPT affect the results we receive, and can we detect biases and limitations based on the results? How can we rely on algorithms which most of us don’t understand?

This might be a challenge unless we have some way of validating or corroborating the results.

For example, I recently did some work on a project for my college reunion, and we tried out ChatGPT to collect details about the world during and since we were in school. The results generally tracked with my memory of the past decades. But I don’t know what was excluded, what emphasis was placed on specific historical events. However, even the OpenAI help page cautions that ChatGPT can provide incorrect information and that users should check other sources. In my case, my possibly faulty memory. (https://help.openai.com/en/articles/6783457-what-is-chatgpt)

The challenge of understanding or being alert to how the training data impacts the responses confronts all of us. Do we just the technicians trained the model properly, using data we feel is appropriate? Do we trust the developers that created the reward system that tells the GPT that a response is correct? Can we rely on the tech companies to install the proper guardrails, so AI tools are helpful without being harmful? Do we apply the same judgment we use in evaluating human truths? Are any of us even equipped to understand how AI training will manifest?

Ted Chiang addressed these questions brilliantly in his novella, The Life Cycle of Software Objects. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lifecycle_of_Software_Objects) In the work, the main characters educate the software entities over a period of years, much like raising children or pets. They rewarded behavior, exposed the entities to new information, and experience, and so on. The owners/parents trained the software entities to be like adult humans, but it took many, many years. It’s only been a couple of years since ChatGPT was released.

Using this paradigm, should we evaluate AI’s performance, searching for nuance and effects from how it was trained, the same way we look at how upbringing affects us and the people we meet?

On the darker side, in a climactic scene in the movie M3gan, the question of understanding how an AI will respond based on training comes up in an unfortunate way. The robot is busy attacking the main character in a dark and dismal basement, and it confronts Gemma:

Gemma: [shakes her head] Look, this is all my fault. I didn’t give you the proper protocols …

M3gan: You didn’t give me anything! You installed a learning model you could barely comprehend, hoping that I would figure it out all on my own. … [Ref: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt8760708/characters/nm6761813]

But not to be too dark and dreary about AI, Star Trek, The Next Generation, as it does, gives us hope. In Season 7, Episode 23, Emergence, the Enterprise creates a new conscious entity. In the ending scene, Captain Picard provides insight into how what we used to train AIs may determine what result we get:

“The intelligence that was formed on the Enterprise didn’t just come out of the ship’s systems. It came from us. From our mission records, personal logs, holodeck programs, our fantasies. Now, if our experiences with the Enterprise have been honorable, can’t we trust that the sum of those experiences will be the same?“

[Ref: https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Emergence_(episode)]

And in the end, does the process matter or is the outcome what’s important? Did the general in Stripes care that Murray’s unit learned the drill in an unconventional way, or was he just satisfied that the drill was completed successfully?

It’s going to be an interesting time, to understate the obvious, as we learn how this new technology will alter our world. Let’s hope it’s more Star Trek and less M3gan.

Leave a comment and let me know what you think.

Thanks for stopping by.

*My reference to Murray’s work in Stripes does not condone or apologize for his alleged inappropriate behavior.

[Disclaimer: Please accept my apologies for any ads that pop up before the linked videos. They do not reflect my position, nor do I endorse any of the products—it’s just a YouTube thing I can’t get around.]

Robot Emotions: Love & Laughter in the Time of AI

Robots. You gotta love them. They’ve been a fixture of science fiction for over one hundred years. I’ve not seen the Czech-language play R.U.R. (Rossum’s Universal Robots) by Karel Čapek that introduced the term, but maybe a science fiction convention somewhere will stage the play. I’d pay real money to see that.

But I prize my DVD of the reconstructed 1927 silent film, Metropolis, robot and all. (I know. I know. DVDs are passé.) [Image Credit: https://cdn.britannica.com/56/80056-050-1ED31880/Alfred-Abel-Brigitte-Helm-Rudolf-Klein-Rogge-Metropolis-1927.jpg?w=300]

There are many topics about robots I’ll discuss over the next several months, including the “dis-embodied” AI version stuck in its own infrastructure. Because, really, the plan is to put a fully functional, self-aware consciousness in a human-like device. Rather like the Terminator, as opposed to Skynet.

Someday, we may get there. But I’d ask—why? What use could there be for an autonomous, humanoid device—do we need an R. Daneel Olivaw, a Data, or, more currently, a Demerzel (for the Foundation fans)?

A friend and I have been discussing that topic and the concepts it spawns for the past year or so. At one point, we concluded that there are at least three reasons to create such a device:

  • Technology. Achieving a technical challenge. Do it to see if it can be done.
  • Companionship. Can we gain some comfort from an automated companion?
  • Labor. They could work for us. Depending on the level of human-like or supra-human-like abilities, that work could be tedious, simple, hazardous, complex, and maybe even beyond a human’s capabilities.

These are not mutually exclusive, and I’m sure there are other lists we could discuss. But this is what the Brain Scientist and I worked from for our discussions. (Sure, a Neuroscientist and a Sci Fi guy talking about artificial brains—what could go wrong? We’ll just stay out of the basement laboratory!)

As to the labor question—well, that’s already our reality. We have robots, even if they aren’t self-aware, autonomous, human-like devices, in all sorts of manufacturing roles. However, NASA is looking at adapting a commercially developed robot to work with astronauts on missions to the Moon and Mars. [Image Credit: NASA]

https://www.space.com/nasa-apptronik-humanoid-space-robots-moon-mars

Robots with emotions, which interact with us and the world as humans do, that’s another question entirely. In our discussion, questions arose: would a robot, could a robot, or should a robot have emotions? What purpose would it serve?

As you might imagine, we didn’t come up with an answer. Nevertheless, there are examples where AI or robots can emulate human emotions and might find some use.

NASA is considering AI as companionship for astronauts on deep space missions. The article’s author asks whether empathetic AIs might be useful in caring for astronauts’ mental health on deep space missions.

[Image Credit: NASA]

https://www.space.com/astronauts-artificial-intelligence-companions-deep-space-missions

The last question for today, which I’ll return to in later blog posts, is how we will react to robots that exhibit emotions. If a robot acts like a human, responding in ways familiar, will we assume it is feeling these emotions? Will we react in kind? And what if that reaction is anger, compassion, or love? It’s going to get complicated.

I’ll leave you with one of my favorite scenes from the Will Smith movie iRobot. In the clip, Detective Spooner asks the telling question: Why do you give them faces?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ouht1xip9NQ (2:41 minutes)

I hope you enjoy the clip. Feel free to leave a comment and let me know what you think the answer is.

Thanks for stopping by.

[Disclaimer: Please accept my apologies for any ads that pop up before the linked videos. They do not reflect my position, nor do I endorse any of the products—it’s just a YouTube thing I can’t get around.]

Lab Food: Better Than from an Algae Vat?

With the recent FDA approval of lab-grown meat for human consumption (AP article here), I thought I might talk about how science fiction has thought about feeding the masses when we’re not living on Earth.

But let’s start with the concept of “manufactured” food replacing grown food.

Back in the day, when I was a graduate student in Ecology at the University of California at Santa Barbara, we learned to calculate the energetics of an ecological web, asking questions about how much energy each level of consumption in a food chain derives from the level below. Our professor being Scottish, had us calculate the energetics of predation in Loch Ness; sorry—no Nessy! So I appreciate it when someone “does the math” on grandiose claims. To understand the energetics of lab meat production, I tried to find out where the “raw materials,” what the companies call the nutrient bath, come from.

No luck. I found descriptions of what generally is in the bath: water, growth hormones, nutrient molecules, etc. but nothing on how it’s made or where it’s sourced. So—more research is needed.

But I did find an article that did the math on how many factories would be needed to replace grown meat with manufactured meat. It’s a long read, but you might find it interesting. (Lab-grown meat is supposed to be inevitable. The science tells a different story.)

Bottom-line is it’s unlikely that the economics or sheer scale of manufacturing capacity required are feasible without significant scientific breakthroughs or external forces that might change the economics.

But someday, maybe in my or your lifetime, humans will live on the Moon, Mars, or long-term stays on space stations, etc. At some point, we will likely need to manufacture food where we live rather than shipping it from Earth, and we’ll need to solve the raw materials and production issues.

But how? Does science fiction provide some insight; let’s see.

We have to start with Star Trek. In the original series, it looked like food came out of a slot and was composed of various multi-colored nodules. Yum?! I’m with Riley—this looks unappetizing, and we never find out how they make it. At least by the movies (e.g., “The Undiscovered Country”), the crew sits down with the Klingons to what looks like a meal of “real” food. Again, no clue where it comes from.

[Image Credit: https://collectingtrekca.files.wordpress.com/2022/03/86a7b-star-trek-the-conscience-of-the-king-hd270.jpg]

Fortunately, by The Next Generation, we had replicators. But in some instances, the food might not have been very satisfying; real food was what they craved. Although, in the video, this martini was apparently pretty good. (The video at the link is about 4 minutes but is a fun compilation of food-related vignettes. Fun to see the two “Q: What is it? A: It’s green.” scenes next to each other.)  Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZHjqCCkpzd8

In his SF murder mystery, The Patchwork Girl, Larry Niven describes The Garden, a vertical shaft in the middle of Hovestraydt City on the Moon, which was festooned with crops: grains, fruits, vegetables, and flying chickens. Niven forecasts we’ll be growing our food like we do on Earth. Open question: where does the organic matter to grow the plants come from?

[On another note: the book’s a great sci-fi read and a real “whodunit.” Check it out.]

The list could go on. A common trope is we’ll grow fungi or food in algae vats, or some machine will produce perfectly balanced nutrition. In the second Foundation Trilogy, vast algae farms feed Trantor, at least in part. And in one of my favorite books, The Caves of Steel by Isaac Asimov, robotic farms on the surface harvest cellulose to supply the vast algae factories to feed the population of Earth’s cities.

In the end, we’ll have to wait and see. Science Fiction presents some interesting options, but who knows, maybe growing salad fixins on the International Space Station might be the beginning of an answer. (https://www.nasa.gov/content/growing-plants-in-space)

One last movie reference and a harbinger of an approach we might not want to take, and then I’m done—honest. The classic Soylent Green depicts an overpopulated, resource-depleted Earth trying to feed the masses in 2022. In solving a murder mystery, Detective Thorn discovers a horrifying reality—and we don’t want to go there.

[Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2aH9tu4s30 SPOILER ALERT – if you have not seen the movie and want to be surprised by the ending – DON’T CLICK THE LINK!] Image Credit: https://www.amazon.com/Soylent-Green-Charlton-Heston/dp/B0016I0AJG

I hope you enjoyed this excursion into manufactured food. We’ve got a long way to go, but I’m sure we’ll find ways to make it fun and tasty.

Thanks for dropping by, and leave a comment if you’d like.